Results of the Pre-workshop voting:

Oops, it seems that you need to place a table or a macro generating a table within the Pivot Table macro.

The table is being loaded. Please wait for a bit ...

Title / TopicPitch (150 words)Name of submitterEmail of submitter
#eduID

In the society of the future, boundaries between institutions fade. Students want to study outside of their own institution, even international. They are interested in a variety of different courses or they want to combine subjects that cannot be found within a single institution.  Moreover, education institutions are offering joint programmes.

To facilitate mobility, students must be uniquely identifiable across institutions. In that way, different institutions can be certain that they are dealing with the same student and can share a student's academic results. The eduID is lifelong available, owned by the student and starts out as a (self-created) basic identity. Assurance can be increased and enhanced by authoritative sources, like institutions or the government.

In the Netherlands, SURF is creating a disruptive concept called eduID. Besides the trust & identity aspects of such an ID, eduID has deep impact on all kind of educational processes inside and between institutions. It would be great to explore the possibilities of cooperating within GEANT to align international eduID initiatives.

Michiel Schok (SURFnet)

Michiel.Schok@surfnet.nl

#eduBadges

At SURF we strongly believe that open badges enable micro-credentialing and therefore are the new digital currency for learning that fit well within a rapidly changing educational system. We see an increasing demand for a more transparent and flexible curriculum, which better suits the personal ambition- and qualification level of the individual student and meet the needs of employers.

  • Why it is important for all of us?
    1. Digital badges help the education system to become more flexible (mobility, life-long learning)
    2. Ability to support students in a continuous way and granular level 
    3. Make data verifiable: need trusted digital data, ability to validate,
    4. Comprehensive learning record in the US (100), competence profile in the EU (knowledge, skill, ability)
    5. Collaboration needed to make the included metadata aligned across Europe
    6. Digital credentials will provide a more flexible and transparent approach to curriculum and grading for all learners

  • Why should we discuss / collaborate about it internationally? or
    How can joint collaboration support building a healthier and more sustainable service? (link to the lifecycle model)
    1. Technical implementation
      1. Align metadata, use of AI to extend services, ID needed as anchor
    2. Vision formulation and support
      1. Policy for data management in a situation where
        1) students have control of their data,
        2) institutions control data they assign,
        3) 3rd parties verify shared information
    3. Employment and use
      1. Persistency of data crucial, however loss will happen
      2. Aligning national infrastructures to badge service development and production model 
    4. Purchase and development
      1. Collaboration is most valuable early on in the technology lifecycle
      2. Will influence future technology design
  • What should be our next steps?
    1. Sharing knowledge about related activities at NRENs
    2. Find valuable use cases for NRENs across the field
    3. Link NRENs and their needs to metadata and standards work
    4. Collaborate on technology to build a badging solution and to verify interoperability
Frans Ward, SURFnet
Alexander Blanc, SURFnet

frans.ward@surfnet.nl

alexander.blanc@surfnet.nl

#Stimulating the adoption of open standardsIn higher education, ICT is used more and more for collaboration and communication purposes. But not every institution uses the same software. Interoperability allows for improved compatibility between different systems, and makes it easier to share data.
Using standards enables data to be exchanged simply, securely and reliably, which benefits the quality of the exchange. It is also more economical and efficient to create and maintain a single interface and to avoid supplier dependence. Reaping the full benefits of standards requires a widespread adoption; applications can only be interfaced simply if as many parties as possible commit to the standards.
 
As NRENs we can play an important role in stimulating the application of standards at suppliers, who work cross border. We can also play a joint role in promoting standards at institutions by promoting standards that are important for organizing future-proof education.
Jasmijn Wijn (SURFnet) & Wietze de Vries (SUNET)

jasmijn.wijn@surfnet.nl (on leave from 19 September till 14 October 2019)

wietze.de.vries@ki.se

#Edu services in NRENs and organizational aspects 


Traditional NREN is increasing its service portfolio within education solutions. Many of these services are quite different from traditional services in NRENs. Much is about joint procurement, follow-up of major international suppliers, influence and development of major solutions used in an international education market, risk management, collaboration on joint work processes, facilitation of collaboration on training and experience sharing between universities, development of joint integrations, etc.

Some questions that may be interesting to discuss:


-What tasks should we solve within edu services?
-What distinguishes these from the core activities of an NREN?
-Where to draw the line between traditional NREN services and EDU services, eg. media services?
-What are the advantages and disadvantages of organizing edu services in a separate body or company?

-How do we balance between procurement (outsourcing) and creation (in-house development)?
-How do we balance the need to produce (huge international contracts and increased service portfolio) with the need to innovate (open the space and time for employee’s experimentation and new ideas)?
-In this new landscape of procuring and outsourcing, how do we keep the best people and acquire new talent (capable of producing ambitious service portfolio)?

Vegard Moen, Unit



Dragana Kupres, CARNET

vegard.moen@unit.no



dragana.kupres@carnet.hr

RESERVE TOPICS for the next workshop
e-Assessment / digital examsNorwegian and Finnish concepts for digital exams.

Marjut Anderson, CSC

Elisabeth Guillot, Unit

marjut.anderson@csc.fi
AccessibilityDue to the European directive on web accessibility, many countries has ratified the directive and formed a law. In Sweden the universities find it somewhat difficult to interpret the law and are looking for a way to cooperate on this. The cooperation is mainly focused around subtitling of videos but the universities are also looking for a model that includes all the aspects.Birgitta Hemmingsson, SUNETbirgitta.hemmingsson@sunet.se
eduBadges

At SURF we strongly believe that open badges enable micro-credentialing and therefore are the new digital currency for learning that fit well within a rapidly changing educational system. We see an increasing demand for a more transparent and flexible curriculum, which better suits the personal ambition- and qualification level of the individual student and meet the needs of employers.

  • Why it is important for all of us?
    1. Digital badges help the education system to become more flexible (mobility, life-long learning)
    2. Ability to support students in a continuous way and granular level 
    3. Make data verifiable: need trusted digital data, ability to validate,
    4. Comprehensive learning record in the US (100), competence profile in the EU (knowledge, skill, ability)
    5. Collaboration needed to make the included metadata aligned across Europe

    1. Digital credentials will provide a more flexible and transparent approach to curriculum and grading for all learners 
  • Why should we discuss / collaborate about it internationally? or How can joint collaboration support building a healthier and more sustainable service? (link to the lifecycle model)
    1. Align metadata, use of AI to extend services, ID needed as anchor
    1. Policy for data management in a situation where 1) students have control of their data, 2) institutions control data they assign, 3) 3rd parties verify shared information
    1. Persistency of data crucial, however loss will happen
    2. Aligning national infrastructures to badge service development and production model 
    1. Collaboration is most valuable early on in the technology lifecycle
    2. Will influence future technology design

    1. Technical implementation
    2. Vision formulation and support: 
    3. Employment and use
    4. Purchase and development
  • What should be our next steps?
    1. Sharing knowledge about related activities at NRENs
    2. Find valuable use cases for NRENs across the field
    3. Link NRENs and their needs to metadata and standards work
    4. Collaborate on technology to build a badging solution and to verify interoperability
Frans Ward, SURFnet
Alexander Blanc, SURFnet

frans.ward@surfnet.nl

alexander.blanc@surfnet.nl

NGLE
(and or NGDLE?)
The aim is to develop an innovative ecosystem that facilitates more open, effective and efficient co-design, co-creation and use of digital content, tools and services specially adapted for personalised, collaborative or experimental learning by students preparing for university.
The learning context from the perspective of the students is the intersection of formal and informal spaces, a dynamic hybrid learning environment where synchronous activities meet in both virtual and real dimensions.  We will address project based learning and peer-to-peer learning scenarios.
We strongly believe that all the tools and services the project is going to use and/or make available (i.e. incorporate, design, develop and test) must be sustainable after the lifetime of the project.
The project is going to develop business plans and investigate appropriate business models using the expertise of the Small Medium Enterprise and National Research and Education Network partners and their contacts with third-party business actors.
Our plan is to make it easy for new schools to join the Up2U infrastructure and ecosystem that will form a federated market-place for the learning community.
Erik Kikkenborg (NORDUnet)erik.kikkenborg@nordu.net 
Assuring Quality in Higher Education through Innovative Teaching and Learning Systems

With the growing proliferation of electronic resources, fuelled especially by wider use of Information and Communication Technologies, higher education institutions have increasingly come under pressure to provide their users with access to more materials and services, even as their budgets have remained flat, or worse, have contracted. National Research and Education Networks and Library consortia are expected to provide a logical response to these demands for costly electronic resource services, but the prerequisite for access and delivery - a reliable ICT infrastructure – has not always been available in many countries.

This paper illustrates how technologies such as Learning Management Systems, e-learning, institutional repositories and web portals (integrated management information systems) are used to ensure effective and efficient access to information. It will also provide a road map for partnerships to support the development of innovative teaching and learning systems in higher education and research community can be built and sustained.

Thomas Songu (SLREN)

tsongu@njala.edu.sl
Digital certificates & security

A good trend of graduate certificates being issued as fake one which is a social malaise and very difficult to prevent using policing. This becomes too malicious when these certificates are produced to a potential employer or foreign institutes (local or abroad) where someone wants to shift his credit while seeking admission. Authority comes to know about this fabrication after a hell long period of time. Even it sometimes goes unnoticed if none complains. The verification process through issuing letter or email creates inordinate delay and sometimes the verification process is itself questionable.

There is a national and international urge to stop production of this fake certificate which dilutes the value of genuine certificate and devalues the claims and rights of real certificate holder.

BdREN would like to introduce Identity Federation for Higher Educational Institutes (HEI) and offer blockchain based, digitally stamped graduate certificate generation and verification; system as a service to the member institutions. Universities will be joining in a federation wherefrom authorized representative of each university will use his/her home credential to login to the application system to generate the digitally stamped certificate. Once generated anyone from internet will be able to verify the authenticity of that certificate. Requirement from the client side will be a Laptop/Desktop with webcam, Internet connectivity and right credential. Employers can also verify the certificates over Internet.

Tawrit (BDREN)ceo@bdren.net.bd












  • No labels