Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

At the moment of the assessment 42 universities out of 80 (Italy) had an institutional IdP in place and running. Currently there are approximately 4 millions of users, out of the 8-10 millions that can potentially join with a 100% coverage.

 

Perceived barriers

...

BioVel

Currently the AAI federations, and AAI coordination activities, have been focusing on the end-user to Service provider direct interaction, in other words enabling simple SSO capabilities on the services. This approach is necessary but not sufficient to fulfil (probably) the BioVel requirements, which envisage a more complex relation between service providers, which need to interact to enable the workflows of the community. Delegation and uniform authorization across service providers will be fundamental bricks of the BioVel infrastructure.

The main barrier for BioVel is the lack of information and knowledge, and the community would benefit from a reliable and organized source of information, in form of online documentation, which can be consulted to take informed decision. Possibly integrate with trainings. Currently the information is very scattered and it is challenging to get the full picture that includes the IdPs documentation, the IdPs federations and the SP federations requirements and best practices.

The training and the documentation should be integrated with a support service and troubleshooting tools, to maximise the efficiency of the federations.

EISCAT

In general the EISCAT community lacks information about federated identity management.