Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 Topic participants

Panel
titleContact dataTopic proposers




Please provide contact details for involved this activity
Panel
title
GN4-3 project participants
working in
the topic


Activity Participants
NameOrganisationEmailRole
Proposer
uros.stevanovic@kit.eduP.I.
DFN-LRZjule.ziegler@lrz.deScrum Master
SURFnetniels.vandijk@surfnet.nlMentor
Halil AdemGRNET
A-Team: Developer
AndrejLitnetandrejshliamin@gmail.comA-Team: Developer




Role within pilot
Panel
titleContact data of Parties involvedStakeholders contributing to this topic


Name
Organisation
EmailRole 
Hannah 
Short

Please provide names and contact details for additional (external) organizations involved in this Incubator project

Organisation Name
Person names
Person email

SIRTFI community (REFEDs)

Hannah

(also in GN4-3 WP5 T4),


DavidG



hannah.short@cern.ch



 Review and feedback
David Group SIRTFI community (REFEDs), (also in GN4-3 WP5 T4),davidg@nikhef.nlReview and feedback
Tom BartonSIRTFI community (REFEDs) University of Chicago & Internet2
)hannah.short@cern.ch

davidg@nikhef.nl

tbarton@uchicago.net
 Review
Review and feedback
Scott Koranda 

 SIRTFI community (REFEDs)

 Scott Koranda (

Ligo

)


 Implement & test solution in context of LIGO


 Topic overview

Panel
titleDescription

Research communities have a need to express and potentially share certain trust marks on IdPs and SPs. These trust marks may differ from existing trust marks issued by identity federations, or may be put in to compliment existing ones, in case the federation operator does not support these, like e.g. in the case of SIRTFI.

This project tries to implement a technical solution that matches the requirements as described by the SIRTFI community and investigates usability of the solution for research communities and the impact of the solution of Identity federations. It also explores potential other scenarios where a similar methodology could be used, like e.g. REFEDs MFA and in the context of the IdP self assessment tool that was developed in GN42

It does not consider itself with the questions on where and how such a tool would be used in the context of existing trust frameworks.


Panel
titlePilot goals

Topic goals:

Please describe the goals of pilot, including activities, participants, the community(ies) that require a solution. Describe when the pilot is done and how to measure the success of it, in a SMART way.

Activity goals

  • Create technical implementation based on
SIRTFI
  • Sirtfi + Registry document
• Distil
  • Distill technical requirements from
SIRTFI
  • Sirtfi + Registry document;
  • Create/Describe technical design;
  • Buy or build (or modify existing);
  • Improve trough sprint iterations;
  • Interact with
SIRTFI
  • Sirtfi working group to improve features if needed.
  • Learn and discuss flows and usability in ‘real world’ (Collaborate with LIGO)
  • Deploy working setup so it can be tested with stakeholders
  • Explore and describe (& implement) authZ architecture in collaboration w/
SIRTFI
  • Sirtfi working group


Panel
titleBackground information

Sirtfi Registry Requirements: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wh2SQU62zDRwlJLPFgwxmRnIq7IiVgPf76XI97Hzt80

Use story description: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14pzjKo-QHWlGd5D0aRRzADSraPcDuf7HbUJrO_IbYqE/edit?ts=5c90ce9d

...

Topic Details

Please describe the technical for this pilot.
Panel
titleTechnical details
details

Initial technical details:

The project is supposed to represent a web portal, where users (i.e. dusters) will access using their federated credentials. The users will, upon invitation, be able to assert Sirtfi tag for the entity under their control. The flow will resemble https://access-check.edugain.org/ . The more detailed description can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hwdi7iO3v2U-RrzgT_EhL7AA0xkE9RIr_bQac2IhZ3M


What is the business case for this Incubator project? Who would be customers of this solution and what would potential business look like?
Panel
titleBusiness case
case

The current plan is to test the implementation, and to determine whether the trust model is satisfactory. Potentially, potential applications of the solution may extend the current Sirtfi+ use case.

...

How do data protection and privacy impact this Incubator project? Think about e.g. handling of personal data of users
Panel
titleData protection & Privacy

With the federated access and adhering to basic principles of Federated Identity Management (following DPCoCoV2 and, e.g., applicable AARC guidelines), no new issues regarding processing of personal data are foreseen.

...

Please describe here the set of criteria that the product must meet in order to be considered finished.
Panel
titleDefinition of Done (DoD)

Work is done when the initial version is implemented and evaluated.

...

Panel
titleSustainability

When this Incubator project is completed, do you intend to continue using the solution? If yes, can you describe how you intent to sustain it? (E.g. through own staff, by using an e-Infrastructure provider, ...)

<Enter here>

Meetings

Date

Activity

Owner

Minutes

Feb 18, 2017

Kickoff meeting

















...