ACTIONS from the 23rd GCC meeting:
- GCC members should provide updates on their individual expertise areas. - Continuous
- GCC members to add additional contacts to the list of subject matter experts for the GEANT Innovation Programme possible reviewers, preferably by Thursday, 11 February midday. - DONE
- Minutes should reflect the process of the communication about that the NRENs are involved related to the GEANT Innovation Programme. This information about the NREN liaison will be reflected as part of the FAQ. We will make it clear in all communications: infoshare, website, guidelines and FAQ. - DONE
- Prepare a proposal on how to measure effectiveness of the GEANT Innovation programme.
- Related to the coordination with the GPPC / FFPA; Channel back to the TF/SIG leaders for feedback on trends and view on future perspectives. Gyongyi to prepare the email and notify the GCC members. - Open
- Related to the coordination with the GPPC / FFPA; Whitepaper to be reviewed by the original proposers and also by the GCC.
- Related to eHealth: The GCC to speed up the process to create a new TF. And Mario and the eHealth community propose the area where the task force should work.
- Claudio and Paul to bring up the question and ask for additional resources to GEANT and the GA for the GCP.
- Gyongyi to set up a meeting with Maria Ristkok and Guido Aben (and potentially with Claudio and Paul) to have an initial discussion about what they would like in terms of topics for a potential extension for SIG-CISS. - DONE
- GCP effectiveness: Apply the scorecard for TF/SIGs evaluation and align it with the GN4-3 reporting. - DONE
- Gyongyi to propose an outline for the GCP Infoshare and help to schedule it. - DONE
Action | Who | What | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
Continuous | Gyöngyi Horváth and ALL | Come up with a topic for a one of workshop (to take place ideally in each quarter per year) the GCC chairs will decide via email (size ~20 pax) | Open (continuously): |
| ALL | Contribute any missing information (regarding established TFs/SIGs information) to Gyöngyi (who is in charge of the document) also considering the impact section: achievements, topics and link to projects / results (e.g. eduroam...etc). Thematic areas supported | Open | |
| ALL | Each GCC representative (alongside GCC coordinator) can follow up with leads regarding outdated KPIs. | Open | |
| Gyöngyi to send a document around outlining her vision for meeting set ups, people can suggest their preferences. | Open | ||
| Gyöngyi Horváth | Following above action, Gyöngyi to ensure the information from SIGs/TFs regarding opinions on impact assessment are provided to GCC (create dashboard) | Open | |
| Claudio | Bring up point 2 under Item 4 to the other parties (Community, PMO) to see what they think is it “organize meeting with TFs and SIGs ? | open | |
| ALL | General) if you find any discrepancies on the wiki pages, please email Gyöngyi | open | |
| ALL | We can try and have a first try with metric benchmark before we meet in November (can therefore see how we can improve it) | open | |
| Chair | Talk with the SIG-MM Steering Committee about producing an overview / matrix of VC tools / comparison (pros and cons) | open |
| ALL | Think of new ways to bring in ideas and suggestions from the Community and NRENs into the preparation phase and feed them in to GPPC and others. | open |
...