...
|
|
|
|---|
| 1 | ecosystem use cases | - compatibility issues (technical, policy)
- cannot solve compatibility and end up with silos
- we cannot cope with the "stability" of paper (issuance, but also verification)
- we cannot provide good enough usability → silos for fixing this
|
| 2 | credential flow | - other standards and architectures are imposed on us, requiring us to change a lot
- not good enough user-friendliness makes the wallet-ecosystem fail as a whole
- GAFAMs to impose their way (including browsers as "their" tool, interference with their business interests)
|
| 3 | credential governance | - how about other governance models being forced upon us?
- intermediaries trying to keep their influence
- overcoming national borders might impose barriers
- failing to communicate the new "VC world" to end users and those engaged in the process
- if usability is missing, the trust governance cannot be communicated appropriately
|
| 4 | Wallet and protocol governance | - Most EU standarisation is behind closed doors and politisized
- Unclear how EUDI will be goverened in the future
- Unclear how much impact EUDI will have. If it does not go beyond Government based data, our sector will maybe create a parallel ecosystem
|
Based on the above definition and the risks mentioned in the table, this classification is presented. That includes other aspect of risk as well.
...
