Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents

#Use this template to capture proposal for a new Incubator Activity - delete this line after using the template#

Participants

#Enter the persons who are submitter of the Activity - delete this line after using the template#
Panel
titleProposers


NameOrganisation
Niels van DijkSURF



Panel
titleGN4-3 project team


#Enter the persons who are participating in the team that works on this Activity - delete this line after using the template#

NameOrganisationRole
BrankoAMRESTeam member
MihálySZTAKI/KIFÜTeam member
Jule, MichaelLRZ/DFNScrum Master, Team member
MartinSURFTeam member



Panel
titleStakeholders


#Enter the persons who are internal projects or external stakeholders of this Activity - delete this line after using the template#

Name

Organisation

Role 
WP5 Service OwnersmultipleService Owners T&I GN4-3


Activity overview

Panel
titleDescription

Distributed Identity (DI) presents an interesting paradigm for the T&I NREN community. Its concepts are very appealing and align well with public values in our community. At the same time many of the technical and functional properties are still in development and present numerous questions and challenges, as was shown in recent work in NRENs and in the Incubator.

The activity proposed builds on earlier work and investigates the following aspects of DI:

  1. What roles could/should GEANT and NRENs play in a DI ecosystem, and what are the associated benefits, challenges and risks?

  2. Which current services in the GEANT portfolio would benefit from the use of DI, and what would that look like?

  3. To what extent can existing initiatives implementing distributed ledgers technology be used to act as a Verifyable Data Registry to satisfy the above use cases and requirements? We should test with for example EBSI, etherium or Sovrin. How do these compare to the IRMA solution we previously tested. (IRMA does not use DLT).

  4. Initial testing with IRMA revealed a wallet based approach may not always provide an optimal user experience. What requirements do we have for the User interface (wallet/app) and can we implement or mock these to test these requirements with stakeholders.

#Please describe the high-level goal of the incubator Activity, provide an overview of the anticipated work and needed resources and skills. Please also describe how commitment from various partners is warranted. - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>


Panel
titleActivity goals

#Please describe the goals of Activity, including what needs to be delivered, participants, the community(ies) that require a solution. Describe when the Activity is done and how to measure the success of it, in a SMART way. - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>

As described in the Activity overview, this activity has mutiple goals:

  1. Deliver a report on what roles could/should GEANT and NRENs play in a DI ecosystem, and what are the associated benefits, challenges and risks?
  2. Deliver a report on which current services in the GEANT portfolio would benefit from the use of DI, and what would that look like? This task also investigates associated benefits, challenges and risks and the business case. What value would this potentially bring to the constituency?
  3. Deliver a proof of concept where we implement Distributed Identity technology using a distributed ledger. Preferably we make use of EBSI, the European Blockchain Service Initiative.
  4. Until now the use-cases tested have focused on straightforward scenarios where a simple set of attributes was released towards services. In this subtask we investigate and describe how to use DI in complex scenarios. In previous work we found that releasing larger sets of attributes does not work well due to GUI limitations. We deliver a whitepaper and a proof of concept implementation on how we can optimize user experience and implementation into existing services. To this end we may implement improvements into IRMA (in collaboration w/ IRMA), describe and test if common patterns like API access may assist in this process.

Activity Details

Panel
titleTechnical details
  • Conduct interviews with stakeholders
  • Describe report based on use cases

#Please describe the technical details for the Activity. - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>


Panel
titleBusiness case

#What is the business case for the Activity? Who would be beneficiaries of the results of the Activity and what would potential business case look like if applicable? - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>

The goal of this activity is to identity the business case for different entities (GÉANT, GN project, NRENs, institutions).


Panel
titleRisks

#Are there risks that influence either the implementation of the activity or its outcomes? - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>Since this is just a research activity, there are no risks involved.


Panel
titleData protection & Privacy

#How do data protection and privacy impact the Activity? Think about e.g. handling of personal data of users - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>No impact


Panel
titleDefinition of Done (DoD)

#Please describe here the set of criteria that the product must meet in order to be considered finished. - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>The expected outcome is a report on the usage of SSI in federated identity management and the use cases for involved parties.


Panel
titleSustainability

#How are the results of the Activity intended to be used? If this requires further engagement, can you describe how you intent to sustain it? - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>

The results will be disseminated among stakeholders and presented at various venue's.

Activity Results

Panel
titleResults
#Please provide pointers to completed and intermediary results of this activity - delete this line after using the template#

This activity published a Report on DI for GÉANT, NRENs and institutions. It was presented at multiple events like the Incubator demo or the Task Force Distributed Ledger Technologies.

Meetings

Date

Activity

Owner

Minutes

15.10.21

Incubator all-hands

Niels van Dijk
22.02.22Public demoNiels van Dijk
03.05.22Final demoNiels van Dijk

January 1, 2017

Kickoff meeting

Documents

Attachments