Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Title

Misc

Description

These requirements were collected via the google form circulated during the I2 Tech Ex 2017.

  • stop inconsistent metadata handling practices
  • more marketing to increase adoption of Sirtfi and R&S
  • Standards for release; enforcing SP-based configuration standards
  • Unified specifications, broader push for common attribute release
  • Federated assertions infrastructure (LF note not sure what this means)
  • reduce the perceived complexity of participation to “support Facebook Connect”. We spent way to much time inventing new terms and ideas, not nearly enough time to reduce them down to “just do this”
  • A Global Trust & Identity Management Lab Plataform (At RNP we curretly offer to researchers gidlab.rnp.br) (2) Translations to portugues of main materials to expand eduGAIN information (3) Benefit costs technology map in order researchers and IT campus staff can start over the easier steps
  • easier integration for SPs
  • Not research based, but: larger framework to handle identity provisioning and deprovisioning as part of a single infrastructure that SPs would need to adopt and IDPs would need to deploy (think: AuthZ often requires local account for cloud service)
  • let's do eduVideo!
  • MDQ as a ubiquitous, class A service; Support for stronger authentication including proofing and binding practices in addition to taming the zoo of MFA beasts
  • federated Cloud access
  • IAM as a service, eduGAIN and eID/eIDAS synergy, more advanced eduGAIN (including IdP certification, IdP categorisation, ...)
ProposerVarious names we can contact them if needed.
Resource requirementseffort and coordination
+1's<for others to voice their support - add your name here>

...