• The correlation (or lack thereof) between an identity in an identity federation and an identity in the wallet
• The correlation (or lack thereof) between the established trust in our inter-federations (such as eduGAIN) and the trust infrastructure that will be used to support the digital identity wallets (e.g. EUDIW)

What do we already know / have written down, and where to find it?

Example: Feide, Norwegian Identity Federation

Had support for eIDAS 1.0 by adding it as an alternative login-method 

The primary PID for Norwegian users has been the National Identity Number. This has good coverage in general, and also high availability in Feide. Expected that it will continue as primary PID in eIDAS 2.0 / wallets.

At this moment not sure how our role will be, but plan is at least to add wallet as an alternative login-method. 

Discussion points from our internal meeting:

• Do we need/want to do anything right now?
  • Feide tries to follow wallet development, per now mainly through participating in this project, and contact with DigDir (https://www.digdir.no/digdir/about-norwegian-digitalisation-agency/887). DigDir is responsible for providing a national EU-compliant wallet.
• Organization centric (Feide) vs. person centric (Wallet)
• At this moment not sure how our role will be, but plan is at least to add wallet as an alternative login-method. 
• What kind of information from Feide is relevant for the wallet? (Role? Student / not student?)