As we know , there are other technologies and companies looking for DI solution. Since many of them are popular technologies or huge company with significant investment, we should consider them as risks for our work. At least we have to be aware of what comes new via them to this ecosystem. So a classification is required.

1- Companies with centralized Identity on the way of decentralization (GAFAM)

2- Competing Technology

3-Marketing

Market Growth Challenges: Expanding the service’s market can be difficult.

Identity programs often need to fill a supply/demand gap in a marketplace, needing to persuade both users and service providers to join their identity ecosystem, rather than use existing or alternative services. This can be true whether the service is centralized, federated, or completely decentralized.

This means that often, digital identity services take much longer to scale than originally planned. Without sufficiently attractive and useful services onboard, the case for signing up may not be clear to citizens, and without sufficient volumes of verified users, service teams may not see the value in the identity service, and may wait for growth. Without sufficient uptake, for new services, the work required to make services truly self-service based on the trust in the identity, can be harder to justify. [9]

4- Environmental cost

5- Funding: A particular scarcity risk, due to lack of funding.


References:

[1] https://www.loginradius.com/blog/identity/what-is-cloud-identity-and-its-benefits/

[2] https://cloud.google.com/identity/docs/overview

[3] https://aws.amazon.com/identity/

[4] https://engineering.fb.com/2022/03/30/security/de-identified-authentication-at-scale/

[5] https://support.apple.com/en-ie/guide/deployment/depa64848f3a/web

[6] https://www.1kosmos.com/

[7] https://www.yubico.com/works-with-yubikey/catalog/1kosmos-blockid/

[8] Travel Identity of the Future—White Paper; Technical Report; ShoCard: Cupertino, CA, USA, 2016

[9] How to control your biggest risks in digital identity