You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 26 Current »

This is the place for T7 participants to express their contribution interests. Please indicate one or more work items and distinguish your prio.

The split in work items is inspired by the ToIP-Model:
Source: https://trustoverip.org/toip-model/

Work ItemContent hintsVolunteer 1st prio

Volunteer 2nd prio and reviewer

Marina Adomeit 

item-specific call #1

Status

RELEASED

REVIEW

DRAFT

NOT STARTED

01 - DI WhitepaperPositioning paper of the GÉANT community towards the emerging DI ecosystem

DRAFT

02 - Ecosystem Use CasesEcosystem Use Cases as per ToIP Layer 4 / Technology Stack

5.2.2024 10-11h

REVIEW


03 - Ecosystem GovernanceEcosystem Governance as per ToIP Layer 4 / Governance StackMohácsi János Christoph Graf 

REVIEW


04 - Credential flowCredential/Identity information exchange as per ToIP Layer 3 / Technology StackMarcus Hardt 
5.2.2024 11-12h,
21.6.2024 11h-12h

DRAFT

05 - Credential governanceCredential/Identity information governance as per ToIP Layer 3 / Governance Stack
5.2.2024 9-10h

REVIEW

06 - Wallets and protocolsWallets and Issuer/verifier/Wallet communication protocols, focus on technical aspects as per ToIP Layer 2 / Technology Stack

DRAFT

07 - Wallet and protocol governancewallet and communication protocol governance as per ToIP Layer 2 / Governance Stack8.2.2024 9h30-10h30

DRAFT

08 - interworking architectureinterworking architecture between the emerging "ID ecosystem" and the existing "global identity interfederation", focus on technical aspects as per ToIP Layer 1 / Technology StackWolfgang Pempe 

NOT STARTED

09 - interworking governance"ID ecosystem" and "global identity interfederation" interworking governance aspects as per ToIP Layer 1 / Governance StackEsther Ruiz Ben 

NOT STARTED

Timing

The 01 - DI Whitepaper should conclude in Q1 of 2024, the other items are more relaxed.

Guidelines

Please check 01 - DI Whitepaper for underlying assumptions

Proposal for structuring the contribution in subchapters (if applicable in your specific case):

SubchapterDescriptionExample
The work itema brief description of the topic at hand, map it to "our world". You may get inspiration from the corresponging ToIP description.
Transformative aspects

What will potentially change with respect to our current way of delivering value in general?

And what will change with a particular view to our ecosystem? Include a critical review of our existing ecosystem services and the nature of potential impact on them.


Opportunities

Describe use cases in our ecosystem that could potentially benefit from an emerging DI ecosystem

Describe assumptions / requirements towards other players / outcomes etc. to make it deliver value to our ecosystem

Describe actions we need to fulfil as a community (ecosystem) to get such value delivered to our ecosystem

Might this make it easier for NRENs to participate in the ecosystem with less effort?


Risks

Describe potential situations or actions of other important stakeholders leading to a failure to deliver value to our ecosystem

This could be linked to external developments but also to our inability to fulfil above actions or to get consensus in our own ecosystem


Engagements

Describe (crowdsourced within our group) prior or ongoing activities in our ecosystem relevant to the topic at hand by NRENs and GÉANT


  • No labels