Versions Compared

Old Version 14

changes.mady.by.user Jule Ziegler

Saved on

compared with

New Version 15

changes.mady.by.user Niels van Dijk

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Panel
titleActivity goals
  • Workflow specification based on a community based approach (i.e. either in text format and/or graphical visualization such as BPMN flow(s))
  • Report on Identification of tools (e.g. REMS) to support the flow
  • Example implementation of at least 1 such a workflow
  • Demonstration at relevant venue
  • Describe how the vetted identity may be used in common authN and AuthZ systems like eduTEAMS

Activity Details

Panel
titleTechnical details

Based on the specified flow, tools to support and implement the flow need to be identified.

The following outputs of the previous Incubator cycle will be taken into account:


Panel
titleBusiness case

#What is the business case for the Activity? Who would be beneficiaries of the results of the Activity and what would potential business case look like if applicable? - delete this line after using the template#

<Enter here>Many services, especially in LifeSciences have a need for Second Factor Authentication (2FA). The quality of the LoA of the 2FA solution depends heaviliy on the quality of the token vetting. Validating the tokens however is potentially a costly effort in a distributed scenario.


Panel
titleRisks
  • Keep the community based approach in this iteration as simple and user friendly as possible in order to avoid complexity which might lead to incomplete work
  • Solution might not fulfill 100% of the use cases

...