Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1.  R&S and Code of Conduct adoption should be the primary focus of this work area in the first instance. Priorities:
    1. Identity federations that are adopting and document.
    2. Calls / discussions with federations asking if will adopt (talk to Mikael about approach for Code of Conduct).
    3. Review supporting documentation requirements for R&S.
    4. Follow-ups from training in Porto (who is attending?) - perhaps online training clips?
  2. We've been asked to slow-down on creation of entity categories until federations have more experience with what is available but two are in discussion:
    1. Academia.  Talk with Mikael, Lukas and Niels.
    2. Affiliation.  Previously discussed at REFEDS but not taken forward. 
  3. Establish a liaison with Enabling Users and identify groups that want to use the categories.
  4. Discuss with Brook / edugain SG - should categories become edugain "recommendations" or best practice or does that over complicate edugain processes?

Expected Outputs?

  • FORMAL DELIVERABLE: Proposal for entity categories adoption in eduGAIN. 
  • Others: contribute to information on the REFEDS wiki, possible glossy promo - need to talk to Cambridge.
  • Progress on academia / affiliation discussions.

Pipeline

Gliffy Diagram
nameEC-definition

 

Risks / Issues