...
Action | Who | What | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gyöngyi Horváth and ALL | Come up with a topic for a one of workshop (to take place 1st quarter 2019) by the end of November 2018 the GCC will decide on the first one via email (size ~20 pax) | Open:
|
| Circulate what resources are available for GN4-3 Community Programme | COMPLETE | |
| To propose a mechanism how to fund attendance at Standardization Groups. Document what should happen when we have an engaged head and funding pot. | Stays OPEN until next meeting. There is no funding problem. However there is problem to find manpower / right people to commit. | |
| to write a proposal for collaboration on supporting Small Projects with the Vietsch FoundationOpen | Closed: Klaas had call with Valentino. At this moment the Vietsch Foundation is lacking proposals, and so are we. We have agreed to revisit this when the opportunity arises. | |
|
|
| |
| Have a list of options available with conditions related to this and have an in depth discussion at the next meeting. (full experience remote attendance by host NREN, limited remote attendance, face-to-face only meeting) | Open | |
| Guidelines for TF / SIG chairs | In progress: TF and SIG Chair Guidelines | |
| GEANT how many of those high effort meetings can it supportOpen | Closed: 4 workshop per year per the GN4-3 workplan | |
| Klaas Wierenga, Gyöngyi Horváth | Open Calls for Workshop - draft the process and requirement | Open |
| Valter to discuss with Klaas about the practicalities of the PDOs and the group to have a plan for continuity | Took actions (Klaas and Valter to provide more information)Open | |
| Valter will come back with a statement / overview of resources allocated to run the workshops by the next meeting. How many workshops can we run? | Open(See as above - 4 workshop per year) | |
| Value statement for a function of a PDO | DRAFTED: Task Force and SIG Secretary Role. | |
| Value statement for TFs and SIGs | Organising a TF or SIG meeting | |
| Value statement for the community programme - Terms of reference for the GCCNH: not sure I understand what this action was - the terms of reference already exist. | It is on the agenda for discussion for 6 February meeting. | |
| Value statement / proposition from TF-CSIRT (Value to GEANT organisation having the brand in the incident response world Value to members and GEANT as network operator to have this collaboration Value in having a host with relatively little baggage (good reputation being neutral) Cost to GEANT members to have it hosted elsewhere will have a negative impact) | See TF-CSIRT Strategy: https://tf-csirt.org/2017/12/18/tf-csirt-defines-strategy/. | |
| Going back to GEANT management to try to find alternative solution for resourcing TF-CSIRT | OpenDone. | |
| GCC to create a statement to support the importance of keeping TF-CSIRT under GEANT | OpenDone. | |
| contact Marcoms to help prepare a quarterly email to GA with summaries of blogs | COMPLETE - guidelines communicated to Rosanna Norman. | |
| Specialised interest experts communication - TF / SIG secretaries to identify which channels they use | In ProgressDone: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AGwaaG3kHlNMJ_xJeDbZT3IT3vixl3HfSfOC1H6pYnY/edit?usp=sharing | |
| VALTER / KLAAS to have a meeting together to discuss the overview of resources within GEANT | OpenDone | |
| Valter and Raimundas to find a time for a joint meeting | OpenDone. |
Action Log - Closed Actions
...