Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

SG members were asked to review federations that have a) been in the candidateThis comes with a caveat that there isn’t yet a decision by the eduGAIN SG on candidate federation status for a long time and b) been voting only members  / non participants for a long time and make proposals as to how to proceed.

Thomas Lenggenhager suggested that a period of 18 months of lack of activity for candidate federations would be a good starting point for reviewing candidate federations.  There would need to be a clear definition of what constituted a lack of activity.   Brook suggested that candidates should have produced a policy and a MRPS within this period of time.

...