You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Here you can submit your proposal for a topic to be discussed with the NREN and educational community to address these questions:

- Why it is important for you?

- Why is it relevant for your NREN?

- Why should we discuss / collaborate about it internationally?

Title / TopicPitch (150 words)Name of submitterEmail of submitter
(example) 

This issue is relevant for teachers, students, university deans and CIOs as well as the national NRENs. It is a future activity that will gain more importance in the future....e.t.c.

gyongyi.horvath@geant.org 
Stimulating the adoption of open standardsIn higher education, ICT is used more and more for collaboration and communication purposes. But not every institution uses the same software. Interoperability allows for improved compatibility between different systems, and makes it easier to share data.
Using standards enables data to be exchanged simply, securely and reliably, which benefits the quality of the exchange. It is also more economical and efficient to create and maintain a single interface and to avoid supplier dependence. Reaping the full benefits of standards requires a widespread adoption; applications can only be interfaced simply if as many parties as possible commit to the standards.
 
As NRENs we can play an important role in stimulating the application of standards at suppliers, who work cross border. We can also play a joint role in promoting standards at institutions by promoting standards that are important for organizing future-proof education.
Jasmijn Wijn (SURFnet) & Wietze de Vries (SUNET)

jasmijn.wijn@surfnet.nl (on leave from 19 September till 14 October 2019)

wietze.de.vries@ki.se

eduID

In the society of the future, boundaries between institutions fade. Students want to study outside of their own institution, even international. They are interested in a variety of different courses or they want to combine subjects that cannot be found within a single institution.  Moreover, education institutions are offering joint programmes.

To facilitate mobility, students must be uniquely identifiable across institutions. In that way, different institutions can be certain that they are dealing with the same student and can share a student's academic results. The eduID is lifelong available, owned by the student and starts out as a (self-created) basic identity. Assurance can be increased and enhanced by authoritative sources, like institutions or the government.

In the Netherlands, SURF is creating a disruptive concept called eduID. Besides the trust & identity aspects of such an ID, eduID has deep impact on all kind of educational processes inside and between institutions. It would be great to explore the possibilities of cooperating within GEANT to align international eduID initiatives.

Michiel Schok (SURFnet)

Michiel.Schok@surfnet.nl

e-Assessment / digital exams


Accessibility


Edu sevices i NRENs and organizational aspects 


Traditional NREN is increasing its service portfolio within education solutions. Many of these services are quite different from traditional services in NREN. Much is about joint procurement, follow-up of major international suppliers, influence and development of major solutions used in an international education market, risk management, collaboration on joint work processes, facilitation of collaboration on training and experience sharing between universities, development of joint integrations, etc.

Some questions that may be interesting to discuss:


-What tasks should we solve within edu services?
-What distinguishes these from the core activities of an NREN?
-Where to draw the line between traditional NREN services and EDU services, eg. media services?
-What are the advantages and disadvantages of organizing edu services in a separate body or company.

Vegard Moen, Unitvegard.moen@unit.no
































  • No labels